The reason is that software must be written to take advantage of multiple processors, and most software is not. (Writing what's called "multi-threaded" software can actually be quite complex - I know, I've done It served well. Easy claims online or by phone. Win2k pro is good for dual core, but not a quad.Always remember.....kitties are all Angels with fur. 'Cat lives matter.' Have made friends in this life. have a peek at these guys
There's no real downside to having more cores, but typically more cores will be more expensive, sometimes by a significant amount.2 If, on the other hand, you plan to run CPU-intensive software that you know will Yes on the surface it seems to use more resources than XP but it's also a tad more responsive too. #15 Parasitic, Nov 7, 2007 techs Lifer Joined: Sep 26, In other words, when compressing a file, the process to calculate the compression is typically slower than reading and writing the file being compressed. Placing data closer to the processing cores improves platform responsiveness and performance with a wide range of applications. read this post here
Reply John October 31, 2015 at 1:04 am What I'd most like to find in a multi-core version is a browser. Close close window If the Adobe Reader does not appear when you click on a link for a PDF file, you can download Adobe Reader from the Adobe web site. What are multichip modules? If you plan to build your own system, get a large CPU fan.
As a result, I'd expect the entire Windows NT line -- 3.51, 4.0, 2000, XP, Vista, and the upcoming Windows 7 -- will handle multi-core CPUs just fine, at the OS Dedicated Customer Service Need quick assistance? Windows 95/98/Me are all based on the old DOS/single-core implementation. - Leo07-May-2009 Reply Mike laycock May 5, 2009 at 11:53 pm Dear Leo,very useful info. Windows Xp Cpu The reason is simple: it's all about the responsiveness I mentioned earlier.
Reply Leo November 2, 2015 at 3:17 pm I believe Chrome is multi-core - it would be one of the reasons that they spawn a separate process for each page. (Fire What does matter is the cpu-load (or core load) and threading. What’s the difference between i3, i5 and i7 processors? Intel's Core i3, i5, and i7 processors present a headache-inducing combination of characteristics. Notenboom has been playing with computers since he was required to take a programming class in 1976.
Useful Searches Recent Posts Menu Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums Recent Posts Menu Log in Sign up AnandTech Forums: Technology, Hardware, Software, and Deals Home Forums > Software > Operating Quad Core Processor Coming from the theoretical to the practical, what I've noted most of all in multi-core systems is the tendency of single-threaded applications to be "bounced" around the two (or more) cores Footnotes and references 1: If you examine processor usage with Task Manager, or a tool like Process Explorer, this may not actually manifest as a single core being maxed out. Join over 733,556 other people just like you!
Add No thanks Learn more 3 Year Asurion PC Peripheral Protection Plan from Asurion, LLC 4.2 out of 5 stars (255) Surge protection starts when your product ships; mechanical and electrical Back To Top Overview Specifications Warranty & Returns Reviews Q&A Overview Specifications Warranty & Returns Reviews Q&A Are you a leader of the pack hunting for monster performance? How Many Cores Can Windows Xp Support Microsoft's official word about multiple processors across all its products is that they are licensed by physical processor socket, not by the number of cores on each processor. Windows Xp Processor Requirements http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280.html#xtor=RSS-182 This is an excellent article using various benchmark tests and compares Single, Dual, Triple and Quad cores.
Just watch those steppings carefully! More about the author If you purchase this service plan and eligible product for this service plan, you acknowledge that Amazon may send the service plan seller relevant product and price information for the purpose I'd avoid them, at any rate. If I upgrade to a system with a single Intel Q6600 quad core CPU, what operating system must I use to be able to use all 4 cores? Windows Xp 64 Bit Processor Support
Double that for mid and high range models. Win2k Professional supports only 2 CPUS; you need Win2k server to use 4 CPUS. When I say "support", I mean support each core (4) as 4 chips and hence I could have 4 instances of RAH running. check my blog I have WinXP Home too on my QX6700.. :-) ..will change soon to WinVista Home Basic 64Bit.. ;-) ..fast, faster, 64Bit.. ;-) From what I have read you need to max
You'll multitask ... $212.95 FREE SHIPPING Intel Core I5-2400 Quad-core Processor 3.1 Ghz 6 Mb Cache Lga 1155 - With intelligent performance that accelerates in response to demanding tasks, such as ID: 635828 · kittymanVolunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00Posts: 47248Credit: 837,966,877RAC: 281,109 Message 635833 - Posted: 7 Sep 2007, 20:24:36 UTC - in response to Message 635828. But of course, MS supports Intel's monopolistic efforts over AMD. #12 VirtualLarry, Nov 6, 2007 stash Diamond Member Joined: Jun 22, 2000 Messages: 5,468 Likes Received: 0 That's an interesting
Or if you had two quad core CPUs, 2000 Pro will still only use 2 cores, whereas XP Pro and certain versions of Vista would use all 8 cores.Click to expand... I remember a long time ago that XP *Pro* supported 2 physical chips and I believe that was it...if you wanted more than 2 *physical* chips, you needed to dump XP I've ran a P4 w/HT on Windows 2000 Pro without a problem. Good Luck and thanks for crunching [email protected] ____________ Thx!
There are several knowledgeable people on this forum that may be able to clear those things up for you. #4 soonerproud, Nov 6, 2007 jonmcc33 Banned Joined: Feb 24, 2002 The problem is the calculation is single threaded in this version of Super Pi so you only see the performance of one processor. Are you looking for the solution to your computer problem? http://internetpasswordpro.com/windows-xp/windows-xp-service-pack-3-support-tools.html They are the best desktop processors on the planet.
Click below to see my werewolf ID: 635769 · jegs Send message Joined: 3 May 07Posts: 16Credit: 7,649RAC: 0 Message 635828 - Posted: 7 Sep 2007, 20:23:37 UTC How about If you have a single quad core CPU, Windows 2000 will only use two cores. Discussion in 'Operating Systems' started by Samsonid, Nov 5, 2007. I dual boot kubuntu and win xp.
I prefer AMD because of price, and have great potential. This processor comes equipped with Intel HD graphics, an advanced video engine that delivers smooth, high-quality HD video playback, and advanced 3D capabili... $223.48 FREE SHIPPING Intel Core I3-550 Processor 3.2 When you compare these results to the speed numbers put up by an Intel E8600 running at 3.33 Ghz we see that clock frequency is still king. Or it may use one core from each socket.
When recently I went out to maximise the RAM on all 3xAsers I have learned that my so ment to be better deal with dual core can only take 2GB of Overclocked really well.Published 25 days ago by David Heisel4.0 out of 5 starsCapableNot the fastest but being quad core it is capable of gaming almost anything anywaysPublished 1 month ago by This brings the question: Wwhich versions of Windows out there support multicore CPUs ? At idle, with no applications open, while running Windows XP Professional SP2, the processor had a low temperature of 47 degrees Centigrade.
If there's multiple cores on a single socket then it will support it. Would I be better off with a dual core or a single core processor? a quad core CPU will work on both XP Home & XP Pro. I was convinced that I had a better PC for a while until I started noticing the difference when I was using my daughters PC.