Home > Windows 2000 > Windows 2000 Running Dog Slow

Windows 2000 Running Dog Slow

This has happened to me 10 years ago, and still happens today, with different computers and different versions of the OS. Read individual tasks and decide if it's performing something you actually want done. Then again this is windoze... 0Votes Share Flag Collapse - Windows 2000 Slow by larrys · 16 years ago In reply to Windows 2000 Slow I think Microsoft needs to look Reboot clears it right up.Help! http://internetpasswordpro.com/windows-2000/windows-2000-server-running-exchange-2003-security-question.html

http://www.horizondatasys.com/en/products_and_solutions.aspx?ProductId=40#Features Also: I'm curious how many previous anti virus software installations left their Non PNP file drivers laying around. The firewall that Service Pack 1 introduced in Windows XP did not rival dedicated solutions, but it was good enough for basic protection that Microsoft also used one in future versions Wait for the MillenniumWindows 2000: top reasons to switch Page 123456789next Windows 10 / HP Spectre x360 More from Microsoft Windows 10 Join the PC World newsletter! Although available titles are still scarce, but I’m sure it will grow in time. https://forums.techguy.org/threads/windows-2000-running-dog-slow.177194/

I guess it depends how long you used Me for but my 95/98/Me machines regularly had to be reinstalled from scratch, usually about once every year or so. in Boston. What if the disk is used by System: unfortunately this is quite common and System is often at the top. If you're new to the TechRepublic Forums, please read our TechRepublic Forums FAQ.

Good Gear Guide Evaluation Team Featured Content ​Oppo R9s Plus phone: Full, in-depth review ​Samsung 2017 QLED Q7 TV: Full, in-depth review ​HTC U Ultra phone full, in-depth review What's the inkjet printers: which is better? Mechanical HDDs don't cut it for system disks any more, really. By Mihăiță Bamburic Published 3 years ago 21 Comments Tweet As I try to start this article with a bang, I realize how difficult it is to describe exactly how I

I guess it's good to know the facility’s there, just in case.) Printing over WiFi is more-or- less standard these days. I looked at the Services and there is nothing that needs to be removed. windows-7 windows windows-8 boot performance share|improve this question edited May 20 '15 at 14:41 asked May 20 '15 at 11:22 PedroD 1988 marked as duplicate by Arjan, Dave, Canadian Luke, Karan, my company It will make a huge difference in performance.

What came after it turned out to be better. Reset Post Submit Post Search Related Discussions 11 Microsoft Surface Studio vs. My connection to Windows XP is purely sentimental, as today my devices are running either Windows 8.1 or OS X 10.9 Mavericks. step4) I ran www.anti-trojan.net/en/onlinecheck.aspx I got a message : port 1025 open, application network blackjack, ICQ, Trojan Netspy, Mavericks Matrix, RemoteStrom Don't know what to do now that I know this

Don't Miss: Updated: Great R packages for data import, wrangling & visualization Sharky's true tales of Shark Tank Newsletters Resources/White Papers Search computerworld Sign In | Register Hi! http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/58811/windows_2000_test_driving_new_os/ What does it mean? I definitely have to donate to you guys. I only did Win32/DirectX/OpenGL stuff at the time) it was probably a free-for-all (no users, no security...) but if you were just writing ordinary code then the basic operating model was

It has been checked for adware and some was removed – made no difference It has Norton corporate version of antivirus software running and it is up to date It hangs useful reference Also please exercise your best judgment when posting in the forums--revealing personal information such as your e-mail address, telephone number, and address is not recommended. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Select forumWindowsMac OsLinuxOtherSmartphonesTabletsSoftwareOpen SourceWeb DevelopmentBrowserMobile AppsHardwareDesktopLaptopsNetworksStoragePeripheralSecurityMalwarePiracyIT EmploymentCloudEmerging TechCommunityTips and TricksSocial EnterpriseSocial NetworkingAppleMicrosoftGoogleAfter HoursPost typeSelect discussion typeGeneral discussionQuestionPraiseRantAlertTipIdeaSubject titleTopic Tags Select up to 3 tags (1 tag required) CloudPiracySecurityAppleMicrosoftIT EmploymentGoogleOpen SourceMobilitySocial EnterpriseCommunitySmartphonesOperating

Take a note that even after that video some programs were still booting up. I haven't heard any major problems from anyone doing this but to be on the safe side back up all important files and programs and back up your registry. Check out Driver Identifier it costs money for the direct downloads but is an excellent [free] tool for at least determining what keywords to look for. my review here Google Drive is now Backup and Sync What's the difference between GMT+01:00 Amsterdam and GMT+01:00 Brussels?

I am seriously thinking getting a SSD if I find out that the HDD is the source of this issue. This issue is the reason why I use Rollback in the first place. –PedroD May 20 '15 at 14:35 2 Im not at all familiar will Rollback but if its Advertisement Tech Support Guy Home Forums > Operating Systems > Windows XP > Home Forums Forums Quick Links Search Forums Recent Posts Members Members Quick Links Notable Members Current Visitors Recent

I scanned then installed the application and spent about 3 hours on it.

These are the apps I have installed: These are my non-Microsoft services: These are my startup apps: (I always keep removing that Google Chrome from the startup but he insists going These are the specs of my current machine, but as I said, different machines, same problem: My HDD status: According to this defrag tool I have my HDD 30% fragger, however Also direct I/O was allowed (IN and OUT instructions), as well as CLI and STI instructions (disable/enable interrupts). Wonder if browse lists are involved... 0Votes Share Flag Collapse - Windows 2000 Slow by larrys · 16 years ago In reply to Windows 2000 Slow I tried and put Optimize

I would try running an offline/Live OS HDD Scan like MHDD, HDAT2, or a drive specific scan like Hitachi Drive Fitness Test. We timed a range of common Word, Access and Photoshop tasks under Windows 98 SE, Windows NT 4.0 Workstation and Windows 2000 Professional on several identically configured Pentium III-600-based computers loaded Or WinXP under 256MB.Of course WinNT OS series is rock solid and cannot be compared to Win9x in that way. justin66 80 days ago > Windows 2000 was dog slow http://internetpasswordpro.com/windows-2000/windows-2000-very-slow.html I'd recommend either a 7200 RPM hard drive, or even an SSD.

Third-party services starting after boot can easily be a big problem. That was a quick check. I think it's unlikely unless your CPU is very old, or you have misbehaving software.