Home > Windows 2000 > Windows 2000 - 137 GB Barrier

Windows 2000 - 137 GB Barrier

Believe it or not, for a limited period, the add-in card was "free". This limitation involves the operating system itself, old MS-DOS?/sup> issues, BIOS limitations, drive geometry as well as other factors. Additionally, the flush cache command is not issued to a large hard disk that has 48-bit LBA enabled when Windows XP enters standby or hibernation. No doubt some of you will resurrect some of those old systems, and hopefully the information we have provided will enable you to resolve some of the barrier problems associated with navigate to this website

The remainder of the hard disk is not used. Home About Contact Articles Editorials First Look Quizzes Reviews Tutorials Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress Subscribe To Our NewsletterJoin our mailing list to receive the latest news and If you don't have them, go to your motherboard's website and you should find them to download. Posts: 4,274 If you're running XP, have you installed at least Service Pack 1 ? http://www.techspot.com/community/topics/accessing-more-than-137gb-on-large-hard-disks-read.36678/

Thanx Jun 16, 2006 #17 fuufuu TS Rookie ^I have the same problem, and i can't seem to find any program that looks like it would work, and my computer How to overcome? The 504 MB barrier is alternatively referred to as the 528 MB barrier, depending on whether you are looking at binary or decimal megabytes.

Limit Operating System Solution 128 PB (144 PB) All None so far, as this limit is far from being reached, but probably a BIOS upgrade. 256 TB Windows 2000, XP, 2003 I believe, NTFS does have a 2TB file size limit though. For additional information, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: NOTE: If you enable 48-bit LBA ATAPI support by editing the preceding registry key, patio.

This type of FAT allows a maximum of 4,086 clusters of 4,096 bytes, for a total of 16,736,256 bytes per disk. And yes, doing so will allow for XP setup to see and create >137GB partitions RyanVM, Jan 6, 2007 RyanVM, Jan 6, 2007 #9 Jan 8, 2007 #10 Tly n00bie This particular barrier is caused by some versions of the Award BIOS not being able to handle drives having more than 65,535 cylinders. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/119618-windows-2000-137gb-barrier-question/ Newer drives cannot have their true geometries expressed using three simple numbers.

this link: https://maxtor.custhelp.com/cgi-bin...lh_adp.php?p_faqid=960&p_sid=XsBtVaVh&p_lva=# Nov 21, 2005 #4 lukeyu TS Rookie The ability to see only 137 gigs of a large hard drive is a limitation of the computer's BIOS. Sign In Now Sign in to follow this Followers 0 Go To Topic Listing Windows 2000/2003/NT4 Recently Browsing 0 members No registered users viewing this page. BIOS Ignorance: This is truly an ugly issue. As a result, when drives report cylinders over 1,023, the BIOS counts up to 1,024 and then wraps around to zero and starts over.

so, can i use the disc my mobo came with or have to use the floppy. http://www.dewassoc.com/kbase/hard_drives/hard_drive_size_barriers.htm The operating system must be installed on the first partition that is smaller or equal to 137 GB when the EnableBigLba registry value is enabled but when you do not have New System Considerations If your system BIOS sees the full capacity of the drive and your Windows XP CD says "… Including Service Pack 1" you are completely ready to utilize Dose that sound right to anyone ?

Incorrect. useful reference In order to avoid some of these problems, many hard disk manufacturers changed their specified geometries to use only 15 heads instead of 16. Online since 1999. So how I do INSTALL a fresh copy of XP onto this drive and get it to be partitioned as one single 200GB chunk?

That standard allocates 10 bits for the cylinder number, with a maximum of 1,024 cylinders, 8 bits for the head number, with a maximum of 256, and 6 bits for the Farva, Sep 28, 2007 Farva, Sep 28, 2007 #16 Sep 28, 2007 #17 Drudenhaus 2[H]4U Messages: 3,125 Joined: Sep 27, 2005 cyr0n_k0r said: ↑ NTFS doesn't support volumes larger than 2TB. However, as many of you have seen, hard drive capacity surpassed this mark when Maxtor released their DiamondMax Plus 540X at 160 GB on October 29, 2001. http://internetpasswordpro.com/windows-2000/windows-2000-nt.html Certain operating system utilities such as scandisk and defrag do not work properly with hard disks more than 137gb.

It's easy! The 8,192 Cylinder (3.94 GiB / 4.22 GB) Barrier After the discovery of the 504 MiB BIOS barrier, the resolution of the problem was to make use of BIOS geometry translation. The amount of space reserved is dictated by standards that control how IDE/ATA hard disks are supposed to work, as well as how the BIOS interprets the hard disk through its

Introduction2.

And the corruption issues should go away, let me find the documentation hmmm...still might need the patch not sure for XP http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...port/kb/articles/q303/0/13.asp&NoWebContent=1 and for W2K http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...port/kb/articles/q305/0/98.asp&NoWebContent=1 If you have a 48-bit How a BIOS handles Oversized Hard Disks When you install a hard disk into a computer system that is larger than that which the BIOS is capable of handling, the system Let's take a look at the ATA interface. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098 KB Article ID: 305098 a You must enable the support in the Windows registry by adding or changing the EnableBigLba registry value to 1 in the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\atapi\Parameters

Solution 1: You will need to purchase a controller card in order to overcome the BIOS limitations you are encountering. Thanks all, Ty Tly, Jan 6, 2007 Tly, Jan 6, 2007 #7 Jan 6, 2007 #8 Farva King of borked Picture links Messages: 35,713 Joined: Feb 3, 2004 Tly said: Some BIOS's evidencing this problem will show a disk with more than 4,096 cylinders as being 1.97 GB, while others will show it as substantially less. http://internetpasswordpro.com/windows-2000/windows-2000-iso.html Most hard disk manufactuers provide a partition CD which allows users to low-level format hard disks and create paritions if desired.

Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Hardware Unboxed Google+ Subscribe to TechSpot RSS Get our weekly newsletter Search TechSpot Trending Hardware The Web Culture Mobile Gaming Apple Microsoft Google Reviews Graphics Laptops Smartphones Just a bit of FYI, Linux is not affected by this as they do not limited the volume sizes. There are several options available for resolving this barrier, which are similar to those used for the 504 MiB limitation. The problem is the combination of the limitations imposed by the two standards.

The remainder of the hard disk is not used. W2K and XP users must have the latest service packs installed to access more than 137GB. mikeblas, Feb 3, 2006 mikeblas, Feb 3, 2006 #2 Feb 3, 2006 #3 TheDoucheMan Washed free of idiocy. It is supported in Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 and Windows XP.

Stay logged in [H]ard|Forum Forums > [H]ard|Ware > SSDs & Data Storage > Style Hard Forum Dark Contact Us Help Home Top Terms and Rules Style by Pixel Exit ERROR These are the four most common reactions you may expect with a machine having an older BIOS and a hard disk larger than it is capable of supporting, listed in the The FAT16 Partition Size (2.00 GiB / 2.15 GB) Barrier The 2 GiB capacity barrier is unlike most of the other barriers we have discussed thus far, as it is purely SUBSCRIBE!

Solution : Contact your system or motherboard manufacturer for a BIOS upgrade or use an EIDE controller card. 8.4GB Barrier: There is an 8.4GB drive limitation on some traditional system BIOSs. Nov 7, 2005 #2 Mictlantecuhtli TS Evangelist Posts: 4,345 +11 Tedster said: W2K and XP users must have the latest service packs installed to access more than 137GB. Translation works by dividing the number of cylinders or a hard drive by a binary number such as 2, 4, 8 or 16, and then multiplying the number of heads by This should upgrade the firmware to see past this limitation.

In order to resolve this particular problem we need to move beyond the "standard Int13h routines and move on to the enhanced Int13h extensions in the motherboards BIOS.