informationweek uses the minimum as a way of suggesting that there's no market for higher speed chips. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Newer Than: Search this thread only Search this forum only Display results as threads Useful Searches Recent Posts More... And in many cases, those drivers won't be immediately available but will instead arrive sometime over the course of 2000. check my blog
Advertisement Related ArticlesJSI Tip 10165. Hence the name NEXT GENERATION!!! It has weird random reboots, stuff crashes and some stuff just wount run. In mid-2000, Microsoft hopes to ship the final version of Windows 98, code-named Millennium.
or iwill say corporate criminals, yahbill gates you can take that bloatedpiece of "shit" xp os and stick inyour ass side ways. - by pinn price list (7:01pm est mon may When it comes to hardware requirements, I like to clearly distinguish between minimum and recommended requirements. Groups will have 8 additional attributes and expand it size to 3418. Will Windows2000 run better with more ram?
Important Microsoft does not provide technical support for BIOS upgrades. yea ok. being that i regularly slog through optimizing and cleaning up the machine - it runs great. If your system does not have Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) functionality during installation, you might need to update the BIOS.
If it's all on there, chances are, the Windows 2000 upgrade will work without a hitch. Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue.View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. They went up to 266 and then it was Celeron, PII, or PPro. http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/7955-2-minimum-practical-requirements-windows-2000-professional For this reason, it's extremely important to install Windows 2000 in a dual-boot situation with Windows 98 so that you can choose which OS to load when your computer starts.
but it's getting to the point where if your needs aren't too demanding, there's less of a need to upgrade than in previous cpu generations. Gamer: Intel Core i7 [email protected], Rampage Edition 10, 128GB (8x16GB) Corsair Dominator Platinum 2800MHz, 2x NVidia Titan X (Pascal), Corsair H110i, Vengeance C70 w/Corsair AX1500i, Intel P3700 2TB (boot), Samsung SM961 And because it offers the same compatibility with hardware and software that Windows 98 has, it's a sure thing for consumers. Tabs System by vbSoporte - vBulletin en Español XtremeSystems Home Forums Search Forums Recent Posts Your name or email address: Password: Forgot your password?
Log In or Register to post comments Tim Prince (not verified) on Mar 1, 2000 I think everyone understands that minimum hardware requirements have more of a legal purpose than anything i however did try to run win 95 on the same 486 with only 4 megs of memory and it was just painful experience. - by ??? Marcs41 (IS/IT--Management) 11 Jun 03 17:55 Win2000 will run just fine, even with just 128MB.Of course it will not be a speed monster.You have to ask yourself why you want to how well will autocad or corel draw run on that system?
If Microsoft doesn't explicitly include support for a hardware device in the box, then you'll need to download drivers from the hardware maker. it will get you on the 'net, edit with a word processor, even listen/watch media files. this is just another example of microsoft's shoddy programming skills. They do just fine.
However it should be OK if you turn off all the themes, and appearances and stuff 2K has. -Kevin #9 Gamingphreek, May 6, 2005 mh1314 Member Joined: May 6, 2005 Thanks Student Log In or Register to post comments richard (not verified) on Mar 21, 2001 I think your minimum requirements are ideal. ALL the PC's in our office are returns from customers due to some problem or another. http://internetpasswordpro.com/win-2k/win-2k-100-cpu-usage-and-large-system-32-folder.html Guest I'd have to have it's something on the mobo or hdd is more than likely the culprit.
victorv (Vendor) 11 Jun 03 18:58 I show you my powerful machine park:Pentium 133 65Mb ram with W2K Advanced Server : itis my AD Domain Controller (also for me is not You might assume that Windows 2000 is an obvious upgrade for Windows 95 and Windows 98 machines, but this isn't necessarily the case. With a modicum of tuning I have several installations of Win2KPro running on 133 and 166 MHZ machines with 64 MB Ram and using ZDNet's benchmarking software, I have achieved performance
i'm working on a computer with a 300 Mhz P2, 196 MB ram, 10GB hard drive, and its running windows 2000 pro. Stay logged in Sign up now! W2K will run on anything with at least 128mb of ram. We run no less than PIII 933MHz and 256MB of RAM.
i even ran apps like photoshop and it wasn't that painful….. Note that these versions of Live will most likely not run well or at all on modern operating systems. Later Log In or Register to post comments Anonymous User (not verified) on Mar 11, 2005 I tried taking the 900mhz and shoving it up my 500mhz pii 2gb... No speed decrease from win98 and its more stable too.
while this was true and my highschool had 4 33mhz 486 sx computers with windows 95 on them and 4 mb of ram, it ran way to slow. ENGINEERING.com Eng-Tips Forums Tek-Tips Forums Search Posts Find A Forum Thread Number Find An Expert Resources Jobs Log In Join INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMSFOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS Log In Come Join Us! purely ridiculous. - by cap'n crunch 300mhz is about right… (4:24pm est tue jul 10 2001)…judging by my experience with the xp professional beta.it felt like a 200mhz mmx, which Posting Guidelines Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.Tek-Tips Posting Policies Jobs Jobs from Indeed What: Where: jobs by HomeForumsDesktop SoftwarePC Operating SystemsMicrosoft: Windows 2000 Professional Forum Win2K on
Join over 733,556 other people just like you! It ran just fine. Similar Threads - system Battery Icon on System Tray darkbloom1, Feb 28, 2017, in forum: Windows XP Replies: 4 Views: 219 managed Mar 4, 2017 Error message - system not installed Hardware compatibilityHardware compatibility is the single biggest issue facing any upgrade.
It is a laptop, but I am not familiar with laptop processors back then. I do not think it is a celeron or PII. All rights reserved.Unauthorized reproduction or linking forbidden without expressed written permission. that was a pathetic platform for friggin dos, much less windows! - by goatguy re: minimum requirements (3:35pm est tue jul 10 2001)havn't you seen on a game or any program